Taming
The RMA Monster
Originally Published in
Nelson Marlborough Farming April 2011
People
sometimes talk about Treaty of Waitangi
grievance Industry, my response is that it has
nothing on the industry that has sprung up
around the Resource Management act.
If
someone were to ask me what is the one problem
with the act, I would say that there is little
or no incentive for many involved in the
process to keep it simple and expedite consents
with the minimum of cost and drama.
Councils'
planing departments have exploded in size since
the RMA became law in 1991. The heads of
these departments are now in charge of many
more staff, presumably with larger pay packets
to match. Why would they want to simplify
things? Similarly the size of the District
Plans have exploded . The other day while doing
a clean out I discovered a district plan
from the 1970s. It was a medium sized booklet.
Nowadays that same Local Authority's plan
is three volumes of large ring binders.
The
justification for this bloat that is usually
given is that the Resource Management Act
requires it. But this isn't
exactly true. Some local authorities
seem to be able to mange on common sense.
A case in point was an inquiry I made to
a West Coast council about a farmer wanting
to chop off a smaller block of his land. I
discussed this with a very helpful council
officer. One of the issues with rural
subdivisions is effluent disposal, so I asked
him what information they would require.
The answer was "I wouldn't worry about that too
much mate I know that area pretty well", he then
paused and thought about it for a while and
said "I suppose you could dig a hole and take a
photograph".
Now
even though it was in an area without effluent
disposal issues, many councils would still
insist on a report by an engineer or an
effluent disposal consultant as part of the
consent process at the cost of a thousand
dollars plus. Their justification for this
is the resource management act requires it.
The real reason is that they have a "don't
leave any stone unturned" policy out of
fear of future liability.
And
it is not only Local Authorities councils who
are to blame, there are those on the other side
of the fence who are part of the problem.
An
example of this is a survey that I was working
on a few years ago when the client changed his
mind and wanted to make some changes to his
rural residential subdivision. Unbeknown to me
he had gone to a lawyer who had engaged
a planner who in turn engaged a landscape
architect. When I found out what was going on I
explained to the client that these folk
were making a meal of it, then I contacted
council and found out that they would happily
approve the change with a simple amended
plan and a half page covering letter.
There
are times when you need to bring in the big
guns, and flotilla of expert witnesses but, but
there are still many resource consents that
are straightforward.
There
are some things you can do to keep it
simple.
- Get a
professional advisor who is familiar with
your type of application.
- Talk to the
right person at council, preferably the
person who is going to process the
application. Don't get fobbed offto a duty
planner.
- Ask the
right questions. If you are not 100%
familiar with the process then take your
advisor with you to council, my firm
generally doesn't charge for these
preliminary discussions, presumably others
have similar policies.
- Often
getting consent is not the issue, but the
show stopper is the conditions that are
attached to it. Try and find outwhat
the likely conditions of consent would
be.
- Ask about
all likely costs to complete your project.
- Then once
you have an idea of the cost of the
application, total cost of the project,
timeframes and the likelihood
of getting consent then make an
informed decision to proceed or not.
This
article is general in nature and should not be a
substitute for specific advice from a suitable
professional. John Cotton specialises in
rural survey and is a Director of Cotton and
Light Ltd a survey firm that works
throughout Nelson, West Coast and
Marlborough
|