Cotton and Light
Surveyors
Call Free - 0800 GO4GPS
0800 464477
Fax 03 5481857
PO BOX 72
Nelson
Reverse Sensitivity
Originally published July
2011 in Nelson Marlborough Farming
A number of years ago
I had a client who was a pig farmer, as well as
pig farming this chap liked to subdivide bits
off his farm from time to time to supplement his
income. One of these sections he created was a
fairly small lifestyle block a good distance
from the piggery. The problem was that in a
Sou-wester the section was directly downwind
from the piggery.
When went to sell the section he was approached
by a lady wanting to the buy it who was a fairly
prolific complainer as evidenced by multiple
letters to the editor in the local paper. My
client the pig farmer respectfully declined to
sell her the section. The story, as told to me,
goes that she rang him up one evening in tears
begging him to let her buy the section. He then
made arrangements to meet her on site the next
time the wind was blowing from the southwest,
they met, she experienced the odour of the
facility at it worst , she said she understood
the issue but loved the lifestyle block so much
she still wanted to buy it, and it was sold to
her.
She made her first complaint to the local
Authority about the smell of the piggery within
6 weeks of moving into her new house. That pig
farmer spent many tens of thousands of dollars
on legal costs and mitigation measures as a
result of complaints including hers.
That is an example of what reverse sensitivity
is. It is when there is an effect of newer land
uses (such as the life style block) on existing
legal land use (the piggery)
This can be a significant problem for primary
producers with potential residential neighbours
who don't want to get involved with conflicts
over such things as spray drift, various
frost prevention techniques, and general noise,
smell and other emissions from rural properties.
One way to alleviate these concerns is to put
into effect a reverse sensitivity covenant at
the time of subdivision. The covenants are also
known as no-complaints covenants and contain
clauses that remind buyers that they are living
in a rural area, and say that farming activities
may be be undertaken without interference or
restraint. Some covenants say the property owner
cannot make a complaint about neighbouring
activity. A rural emanations easement is another
similar mechanism which achieves much the same
thing.
It may be true that these types of legal
instruments have not been fully tested in the
courts, and that some lawyer and planners have
doubts as to their full enforceability under the
Resource management Act and Bill of Rights. I am
no expert in such things, I'll leave that to the
lawyers, but from my experience they are a
practical way to make a buyer aware of the
potential adverse effects of of the nearby rural
activity and to limit the damage from potential
complaints.
These sorts of covenants can also be used in
situations other than subdivisions. Several of
our forestry clients create covenants in favour
of themselves whenever they sell land which is
nearby other land they own. In this way the
covenant is in place no matter what happens to
the land they have sold.
This article is general in nature and should not
be a substitute for specific advice from a
suitable professional.
John Cotton specialises in rural surveys and is
a Director of Cotton and Light Ltd a survey firm
that works throughout Nelson, West Coast and
Marlborough. |
|
Home - Services
- About
Us - Contact Article Index
|